<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Left Calvary Chapel: a non-denominational denomination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/</link>
	<description>The modern pulpit from a reforming layman&#039;s perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cynthia curran</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>cynthia curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Actually, the orthodox church spilt in the age of Justinian. The monophysites or now the oriential well there way. Jacob Braedius with the help of empress Theodora started churches without the approval of the emperor Justinian. The writings of Serveus of Antioch were ban by Justinian and he was exile. The oriential Church still doesn&#039;t accept Chalecdon while the eastern do. And Justinian after alienated some of the western Church by imprisoning Victor Tunna who didn&#039;t accept his view on the three chapters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the orthodox church spilt in the age of Justinian. The monophysites or now the oriential well there way. Jacob Braedius with the help of empress Theodora started churches without the approval of the emperor Justinian. The writings of Serveus of Antioch were ban by Justinian and he was exile. The oriential Church still doesn&#8217;t accept Chalecdon while the eastern do. And Justinian after alienated some of the western Church by imprisoning Victor Tunna who didn&#8217;t accept his view on the three chapters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Love expository preaching when it is doctrinally correct, but CCs focus on it exclusively is flawed. None of the preaching recorded in the Bible by any of the prophets or the Lord himself was done in the manner CC does it, it was mainly topical. The reason is simple. preaching by itself is never meant to be merely educational, it is meant to illuminate doctrine and bring the hearer to a decision point to follow right doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love expository preaching when it is doctrinally correct, but CCs focus on it exclusively is flawed. None of the preaching recorded in the Bible by any of the prophets or the Lord himself was done in the manner CC does it, it was mainly topical. The reason is simple. preaching by itself is never meant to be merely educational, it is meant to illuminate doctrine and bring the hearer to a decision point to follow right doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayla</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>One more comment about Orthodoxy. Most Protestants, especially of the evangelical type, do not know the difference between Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. When the great split occurred in 1054 because the Roman patriarch wanted to be the head guy, the rest of the patriarchs said no and they split (that and the fililoque clause caused it.) Anyway, the Eastern church just kept going and didn&#039;t change. The Roman branch with it&#039;s pope became the Roman Catholic Church with all it&#039;s additions and changes. Then it split further in 1513 with Martin Luther and now we have all these denominations and their countless divisions, and strange doctrines. 
But Orthodoxy has never seen a split and has not changed in any significant way since the very beginning. It is Orthodox, but not Jewish. It is Catholic, but not Roman. It is evangelical, but not Protestant. It is not denominational, but pre-denominational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more comment about Orthodoxy. Most Protestants, especially of the evangelical type, do not know the difference between Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. When the great split occurred in 1054 because the Roman patriarch wanted to be the head guy, the rest of the patriarchs said no and they split (that and the fililoque clause caused it.) Anyway, the Eastern church just kept going and didn&#8217;t change. The Roman branch with it&#8217;s pope became the Roman Catholic Church with all it&#8217;s additions and changes. Then it split further in 1513 with Martin Luther and now we have all these denominations and their countless divisions, and strange doctrines.<br />
But Orthodoxy has never seen a split and has not changed in any significant way since the very beginning. It is Orthodox, but not Jewish. It is Catholic, but not Roman. It is evangelical, but not Protestant. It is not denominational, but pre-denominational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-994</guid>
		<description>My husband and I have left a rather large and very popular CC due to doctrinal issues and having been called elsewhere by the Lord.  We also know many people who have left and they are by far the more biblically studious and doctrinally sound people we know.

The CC we attended was full of jokes and was also full of Bible teaching.  It was also guilty of glossing over hard verses, especially 2 Thessalonians 2:3, which rather flies in the face of a pre-trib doctrine, one which CCs hold to dearly.  Our pastor said of this passage that &quot;people think it speaks against pre-trib rapture, but that is a mis-read&quot;.  That&#039;s all he said about it.  Never went into WHY he&#039;s so sure it&#039;s a mis-read or WHY he&#039;s so sure it supports his pre-trib side.

We are not anti-Calvary, but they, and by they I mean some of the big name pastors, are sliding away from solid Biblical teaching into heresies of a grand scale --- including Chuck, who even said abortion was right for one woman in a radio call in show.  

Would we go back if the Lord called us there?  Of course.  MANY churches are falling away and many have some doctrinal issues.  They&#039;re all taught by men, so of course there will be errors in teaching.  In fact, our CC pastor always told us to check out what he taught if we thought it was wrong.  Doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;d recant if we showed it to him, however, for whatever that&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and I have left a rather large and very popular CC due to doctrinal issues and having been called elsewhere by the Lord.  We also know many people who have left and they are by far the more biblically studious and doctrinally sound people we know.</p>
<p>The CC we attended was full of jokes and was also full of Bible teaching.  It was also guilty of glossing over hard verses, especially 2 Thessalonians 2:3, which rather flies in the face of a pre-trib doctrine, one which CCs hold to dearly.  Our pastor said of this passage that &#8220;people think it speaks against pre-trib rapture, but that is a mis-read&#8221;.  That&#8217;s all he said about it.  Never went into WHY he&#8217;s so sure it&#8217;s a mis-read or WHY he&#8217;s so sure it supports his pre-trib side.</p>
<p>We are not anti-Calvary, but they, and by they I mean some of the big name pastors, are sliding away from solid Biblical teaching into heresies of a grand scale &#8212; including Chuck, who even said abortion was right for one woman in a radio call in show.  </p>
<p>Would we go back if the Lord called us there?  Of course.  MANY churches are falling away and many have some doctrinal issues.  They&#8217;re all taught by men, so of course there will be errors in teaching.  In fact, our CC pastor always told us to check out what he taught if we thought it was wrong.  Doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;d recant if we showed it to him, however, for whatever that&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvary</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sadly Calvary thinks reading whole chapters at a time and then making funny jokes, and telling stories is expository teaching.&quot;

As someone who was in a leadership position at a very large Calvary Chapel for years, I must say I agree with this statement.  This is what you get when you make electricians and plumbers pastors.  They have not attended seminary, and in most cases have not even earned an undergraduate degree.  Not surprisingly, there is a serious lack in the abilities of the pastors to think critically and present the gospel in an organized manner.  Attendees are left with personal stories and useful anecdotes from relatively-charismatic-yet-alarmingly-simpleminded guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sadly Calvary thinks reading whole chapters at a time and then making funny jokes, and telling stories is expository teaching.&#8221;</p>
<p>As someone who was in a leadership position at a very large Calvary Chapel for years, I must say I agree with this statement.  This is what you get when you make electricians and plumbers pastors.  They have not attended seminary, and in most cases have not even earned an undergraduate degree.  Not surprisingly, there is a serious lack in the abilities of the pastors to think critically and present the gospel in an organized manner.  Attendees are left with personal stories and useful anecdotes from relatively-charismatic-yet-alarmingly-simpleminded guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Mike, I&#039;ve been attending CC for 10 years.  Several weeks ago, I provided to my pastor and the board- John Pillivant at CC-Bartlett, TN - with documentation about CC-Bartlett&#039;s support for unscriptural divorce in the and &quot;respecter of persons&quot; bias.  I provided court testimony attesting to said conduct and scriptural justification for my concerns to back up the legal documents.  Within 24 hours, I was kicked out of the church via a phone call from one of the pastor&#039;s board members.  The following Sunday, people tell me that I was publicly accused of many sins including rebellion (Titus 3:10) and my excommunication was announced from the pulpit by Pastor John.

I&#039;ve been a Christian for 37 years and have walked consistently with Christ since conversion - and I know my Bible.  Calvary Chapel is NOT a cult - but it is cult-like in leadership and practice.  And you can blame it all on Calvary Chapel Distinctives and the Moses Model which fosters a belief that church leaders are above &quot;ordinary Christians&quot; and do no sin like the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I&#8217;ve been attending CC for 10 years.  Several weeks ago, I provided to my pastor and the board- John Pillivant at CC-Bartlett, TN &#8211; with documentation about CC-Bartlett&#8217;s support for unscriptural divorce in the and &#8220;respecter of persons&#8221; bias.  I provided court testimony attesting to said conduct and scriptural justification for my concerns to back up the legal documents.  Within 24 hours, I was kicked out of the church via a phone call from one of the pastor&#8217;s board members.  The following Sunday, people tell me that I was publicly accused of many sins including rebellion (Titus 3:10) and my excommunication was announced from the pulpit by Pastor John.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a Christian for 37 years and have walked consistently with Christ since conversion &#8211; and I know my Bible.  Calvary Chapel is NOT a cult &#8211; but it is cult-like in leadership and practice.  And you can blame it all on Calvary Chapel Distinctives and the Moses Model which fosters a belief that church leaders are above &#8220;ordinary Christians&#8221; and do no sin like the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathryn</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>One commentor was saying that CC teach Jesus as Savior but not as Lord and Savior.

I disagree that doctrinally that is what is taught after all my years with CCs. I was always taught by CC pastors that Lordship is just as much required as Jesus being Savior.

However I have seen in more recent years an entertainment driven church bent on materialism and luxury worship and lacking in personal ministry to the poor, the hungry, and evangelism. I am  not saying that is what is taught or that the churches don&#039;t minister in such ways as a body. But I see, where once a CC would have folks going out to the streets now many are giving money to the local mission instead. So the money is given and used but the people are not actually persuing doing these things because instead they&#039;re going bowling, to the movies, and on vacation, oh and to Israel, while the rest of the world is going down to the pit.

I know, maybe I sound like a pharisee or legalistic but I see a marked change in the church of today compared to 20, 30 years ago. I don&#039;t know that the problem is the leadership or CC distinctives. I think people just think Christ is their warm fuzzy psycholigist that gives them anti depressants rather than being Lord.

But I try to avoid the subject around other believers lest I be stoned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One commentor was saying that CC teach Jesus as Savior but not as Lord and Savior.</p>
<p>I disagree that doctrinally that is what is taught after all my years with CCs. I was always taught by CC pastors that Lordship is just as much required as Jesus being Savior.</p>
<p>However I have seen in more recent years an entertainment driven church bent on materialism and luxury worship and lacking in personal ministry to the poor, the hungry, and evangelism. I am  not saying that is what is taught or that the churches don&#8217;t minister in such ways as a body. But I see, where once a CC would have folks going out to the streets now many are giving money to the local mission instead. So the money is given and used but the people are not actually persuing doing these things because instead they&#8217;re going bowling, to the movies, and on vacation, oh and to Israel, while the rest of the world is going down to the pit.</p>
<p>I know, maybe I sound like a pharisee or legalistic but I see a marked change in the church of today compared to 20, 30 years ago. I don&#8217;t know that the problem is the leadership or CC distinctives. I think people just think Christ is their warm fuzzy psycholigist that gives them anti depressants rather than being Lord.</p>
<p>But I try to avoid the subject around other believers lest I be stoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathryn</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Also there are people saying some ought to return to the Roman Catholic church to get back to the real deal. That might have worked for me if it had not been for the fact I studied church history and then found out that the Holy Roman Empire changed the Bishop leadership of the Orthodox church to a Papal leadership that never existed in order to give the Holy Roman Empire complete control over all the Bishops in the other districts. Calvinism or not, I could not hang with that. And all that fuedalism without education leading to Biblical illiteracy to gain political control. It was time for a reformation. But when I saw people bowing down to a statue of Mary at my sister in law&#039;s wedding, I knew I could never be Catholic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also there are people saying some ought to return to the Roman Catholic church to get back to the real deal. That might have worked for me if it had not been for the fact I studied church history and then found out that the Holy Roman Empire changed the Bishop leadership of the Orthodox church to a Papal leadership that never existed in order to give the Holy Roman Empire complete control over all the Bishops in the other districts. Calvinism or not, I could not hang with that. And all that fuedalism without education leading to Biblical illiteracy to gain political control. It was time for a reformation. But when I saw people bowing down to a statue of Mary at my sister in law&#8217;s wedding, I knew I could never be Catholic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathryn</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>I have to agree and disagree with some of the things said here.

I was with Calvary Chapels on and off (mostly on) for almost 30 years and finally gave up on them recently.

Someone here was saying the CCs never teach the Ten Commandments. My husband was teaching a CC Cub Scout troop a Bible study and the boys were mandated to memorize the Ten Commandments by our pastor of CC. 

My first and former pastor was a dispensationalist and graduated from Bible College and Seminary, but I see people here saying pastors with CC are not properly trained and are not dispensationalists. I think it varies from congregation to congregation and pastor to pastor.

I agree that some CC pastors, including one I hear on the radio all the time, teach a mistaken version of the ability to lose ones salvation from the book of Hebrews when the Bible clearly teaches otherwise if one looks at the historical context of why the book of Hebrews was written. I find it very concerning.  And when one reads into John&#039;s epistles the concept that one who sins is apparently suddenly not saved. This kind of overlooks the original language of the text wherein it is clearly meant that we cannot lose our salvation because we are viewed in Christ especially in light of Romans wherein Paul clearly admitted he did things he ought not do. But once again, not all CC pastors are making these doctrinal mistakes though some were and are in CC and in other churches. And truthfully I would not have realized the mistakes if I had not gone to a conservative Bible College myself(not a CC Bible College) and studied the word more thoroughly on my own.

It has been implied CC never welcome Calvinists. CCs do welcome Calvinists until they start talking about Calvinism. The minute that happens they are rebuked and made unwelcome. I saw it firsthand and was very saddened because whether we agree on these issues or not I don&#039;t think our salvation is based on anything or anyone but Jesus Christ. Yes the subject is crucial to proper doctrine and many would change fellowships over such a doctrinal difference. But I don&#039;t think one could lose ones salvation over a difference in this point of doctrine. But that is my opinion and I am not a pastor.

I suggest if someone wants to fellowship with CC they ought to read Chuck Smith&#039;s book on the CC distinctives so they can better decide whether that is what they want to believe and be taught through the lense of. 

Just remember when you do that Chuck Smith counseled a woman to have an abortion on his radio program and has never repented and I have not seen anything about him being rebuked by leadership. That was one of the reasons our family finally gave up on CCs forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree and disagree with some of the things said here.</p>
<p>I was with Calvary Chapels on and off (mostly on) for almost 30 years and finally gave up on them recently.</p>
<p>Someone here was saying the CCs never teach the Ten Commandments. My husband was teaching a CC Cub Scout troop a Bible study and the boys were mandated to memorize the Ten Commandments by our pastor of CC. </p>
<p>My first and former pastor was a dispensationalist and graduated from Bible College and Seminary, but I see people here saying pastors with CC are not properly trained and are not dispensationalists. I think it varies from congregation to congregation and pastor to pastor.</p>
<p>I agree that some CC pastors, including one I hear on the radio all the time, teach a mistaken version of the ability to lose ones salvation from the book of Hebrews when the Bible clearly teaches otherwise if one looks at the historical context of why the book of Hebrews was written. I find it very concerning.  And when one reads into John&#8217;s epistles the concept that one who sins is apparently suddenly not saved. This kind of overlooks the original language of the text wherein it is clearly meant that we cannot lose our salvation because we are viewed in Christ especially in light of Romans wherein Paul clearly admitted he did things he ought not do. But once again, not all CC pastors are making these doctrinal mistakes though some were and are in CC and in other churches. And truthfully I would not have realized the mistakes if I had not gone to a conservative Bible College myself(not a CC Bible College) and studied the word more thoroughly on my own.</p>
<p>It has been implied CC never welcome Calvinists. CCs do welcome Calvinists until they start talking about Calvinism. The minute that happens they are rebuked and made unwelcome. I saw it firsthand and was very saddened because whether we agree on these issues or not I don&#8217;t think our salvation is based on anything or anyone but Jesus Christ. Yes the subject is crucial to proper doctrine and many would change fellowships over such a doctrinal difference. But I don&#8217;t think one could lose ones salvation over a difference in this point of doctrine. But that is my opinion and I am not a pastor.</p>
<p>I suggest if someone wants to fellowship with CC they ought to read Chuck Smith&#8217;s book on the CC distinctives so they can better decide whether that is what they want to believe and be taught through the lense of. </p>
<p>Just remember when you do that Chuck Smith counseled a woman to have an abortion on his radio program and has never repented and I have not seen anything about him being rebuked by leadership. That was one of the reasons our family finally gave up on CCs forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://www.modernpulpit.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thlibo.com/2009/04/10/why-i-left-calvary-chapel-a-non-denominational-denomination/#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Works based faith is taught along with justification by faith. Chucks likes if you abide in me i will abide in you. without looking at the word abide. God has a giant eraser and is writing your name in and out of the book of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works based faith is taught along with justification by faith. Chucks likes if you abide in me i will abide in you. without looking at the word abide. God has a giant eraser and is writing your name in and out of the book of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

